tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9620948.post7333937248976405497..comments2023-10-20T12:24:17.734-07:00Comments on Binstock on Software: How Many Unit Tests Are Enough?Andrew Binstockhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16321156191558412680noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9620948.post-69114560942919401212007-08-10T23:27:00.000-07:002007-08-10T23:27:00.000-07:00TOJZ: At the time, it was purely the size in bytes...TOJZ: At the time, it was purely the size in bytes measured by hand totalling the directory sizes. Today, I use an awk script (technically gawk) to count lines of code. <BR/><BR/>On this LOC basis, I am currently at 49%. Emma tells me I am getting 66% code coverage. From these figures, it would appear that given parity in codebase sizes, Agitar's projection of 70% code coverage looks low.Andrew Binstockhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16321156191558412680noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9620948.post-39261276594322700552007-08-10T15:34:00.000-07:002007-08-10T15:34:00.000-07:00TOJZand how (with which tool) did you measure 42%?...TOJZ<BR/>and how (with which tool) did you measure 42%?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9620948.post-46316178505067200142007-03-02T07:19:00.000-08:002007-03-02T07:19:00.000-08:0042%? You're actually doing much better than most ...42%? You're actually doing much better than most <A HREF="http://www.agitar.com/openquality/open_quality_data.html" REL="nofollow">other projects</A>...Jeffrey Fredrickhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02000091893345778110noreply@blogger.com